Transcript of a discussion on how healthcare providers are employing processes and technologies from such industries as retail and financial services to vastly improve the experience and quality of care from the medical patients’ perspective.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Download the transcript. Sponsor: HealthPay24.
Dana
Gardner: Hi, this is Dana Gardner, Principal
Analyst at Interarbor Solutions,
and you’re listening to BriefingsDirect. Our next healthcare insights
discussion explores the shift medical services providers are making to improve
the overall patient experience.
 |
| Gardner |
Taking
a page from modern, data-driven industries that emphasize consumer satisfaction
and ease, a major
hospital in the New York metro area has embarked on a journey to transform
healthcare-as-a-service.
To
learn more about the surging importance and relevance for improving patient
experiences in the healthcare sector using the many tools available to other
types of businesses, we are joined by Laura Semlies, Vice President of Digital
Patient Experience, at Northwell Health in metro New York, and Julie Gerdeman, President at HealthPay24 in Mechanicsburg, Penn. Welcome
to you both.
What
are the trends driving a makeover in the overall medical patient experience?
Semlies: The trend we’re watching is recognizing
the patient as a consumer. Now, healthcare systems are even calling patients “consumers”
-- and that is truly critical.
In our organization we look at [Amazon founder and CEO] Jeff Bezos’ very popular comment about having “customer obsession” -- and not “competition obsession.” In doing so, you better understand what the patient needs and what the patient wants as a consumer. Then you can begin to deliver a new experience.
Gardner: This is a departure. It wasn't that
long ago when a patient was typically on the receiving end of information and care
and was almost expected to be passive. They were just off on their way after
receiving treatment. Now, there’s more information and transparency up-front.
What is it about the emphasis
on information sharing that’s changed, and why?
Power to the patients
Semlies: A lot of it has to do with what patients
experience in other
industries, and they are bringing those expectations to healthcare. Almost
every industry has fundamentally changed over the course of a last decade, and
patients are bringing those changes and expectations into healthcare.
 |
| Semlies |
In
a digital world, patients expect their data is out there and they expect us to
be using it to be more transparent, more personalized, and with more curated experiences.
But in healthcare we haven’t figured it out just yet -- and that’s what digital
transformation in healthcare means.
How
do you take information and translate it into more meaningful and personalized
services to get to the point where patients have experiences that drive better
clinical outcomes?
Gardner: Healthcare then becomes more of a marketplace.
Do you feel like you’re in competition? Could other providers of healthcare
come in with a better patient experience and draw the patients away?
Semlies: For sure. I don’t know if that’s true
in every market, but it certainly is in the market that I operate in. We live
in a very competitive market in New York. The reality is if the patient is not
getting the experience they want, they have choices, and they will opt for
those choices.
A
recent study concluded that 2019 will be the year that patients choose who
renders their care based on things that they do or do not get. Those things can
range from the capability to book appointments online, to having virtual visits,
to access to a patient portal with medical record information -- or all of the
above.
And
those patients are going to be making those choices tomorrow. If you don’t have
those capabilities to treat the patient and meet their needs -- you won't get
that patient after tomorrow.
Gardner: Julie, we're seeing a transition to the
healthcare patient experience similar to what we have seen in retail, where the
emphasis is on an awesome experience. Where do you see the patient
experience expanding next? What needs to happen to make it a more complete
experience?
Gerdeman: Laura is exactly right. Patients are
doing research upfront before providers interact with them, before they even
call and book an appointment. Some 70 percent of patients spend that time to look
at something online or make a phone call.
Competitive, clinical customer services
We’re now talking about addressing a
complete experience. That means everything from up-front research, through the
clinical experience, and including the financial and billing experiences. It
means end-to-end, from pre-service through post-service.
 |
| Gerdeman |
And
that financial experience needs to be at or better than the level of experience
they had clinically. Patients are judging their experience end-to-end, and it
is competitive. We hear from healthcare providers who want to keep patients out
of their competitors’ waiting rooms. Part of that is driving an improved experience,
where the patient-as-consumer is informed and engaged throughout the process.
Financially
speaking, what does that mean? It means digital engagement -- something simple,
beautiful, and mobile that’s delivered via email or text. We have to meet the
consumer, whenever, and wherever they are. That could be in the evening or
early in the morning on their devices.
That’s how people live today. Those
personalized and curated experiences with Google
or Alexa,
they want that same experience in healthcare.
Gardner: You don’t want a walk into a time
machine and go back 30 to 40 years just because you go to the hospital. The
same experience you can get in your living room should be there when you go to
see your doctor.
Laura,
patient-centric care is complicated enough in just trying to understand the
medical issues. But now we have a growing level of complexity about the finances.
There are co-pays, deductibles, different kinds of insurance, and supplemental
insurance. There are upfront cost estimates versus who knows what the bill is going
to be in six months.
How
do we fulfill the need for complete patient-centric services when we now need
to include these complex financial issues, too?
Semlies:
One way is to segment patients
based on who they are at any moment. Patients can move very quickly from a
healthy state to a state of chronic disease management. Or they can go from an
episode where they need very intense care to quickly being at home.
First,
you need to understand where the patients’ pain points are across those
different patient journeys.
Second is studying your data
and looking back and analyzing it to understand what those ranges of
responsibility look like. Then you can start to articulate and package those
things. You have more norms to do early and targeted financial counseling.
The final part is being able
to communicate, even as things change in a person’s course of treatment, and that
has an impact on your financial responsibility. That kind of dialogue in our
industry is almost non-existent right now.
Sharing data and dialogue
Among the first things patients look for
is via searches based on their insurance carrier. Well, insurance isn’t enough.
It’s not enough to know you are going to see doctor so-and-so for x with
insurance plan B. You need to know far more than that to really get an accurate
sense of what’s going on. Our job is to figure out how to do that for patients.
We have to get really good
at figuring out how to deliver the right level of detail on information about
you and what you are seeking. We need to know enough about our healthcare
system, what are the costs are and what the options are so that we can engage
in dialogue.
It could be a digital
dialogue, but we have to engage in a dialogue. The reality is we know even in a
digital situation that patients only want to share certain amount of
information. But they also want accurate information. So what’s that balance? How
do you achieve that? I think the next 12 to 18 months is going to be about
figuring that out.
Transparency isn’t only posting
a
set of hospital charges; it’s just not. It’s a step in the right direction.
There is now a mandate saying
that transparency is important, and we all agree with that. Yet we still need meaningful
transparency, which includes the ability to start to control your options and
make decisions in association with a patients’ financial health goals, too.
Gardner: So, the right information, to the right
person, in the right context, at the right time. To me, that means a conversation
based on shared data, because without data all along the way you can’t get the
context.
What is the data sharing and
access story behind the patient-centric experience story?
One of the biggest problems right now is the difference between an explanation of benefits and a statement. They don't say the same thing, and are coming from two different places. It's very difficult to explain to a patient.
Semlies:
If we look at the back-end
of the journey, one of the biggest problems right now is the difference between
an explanation of benefits and a statement. They don’t say the same thing, and
they are coming from two different places. It’s very difficult to explain everything
to a patient when you don’t have that explanation of
benefits (EOB) in front of you.
What
we’re going to see in the next months and years -- as more collaboration is
needed between payers and health systems and providers – is a new standard
around how to communicate. Then we can perhaps have an independent dialogue
with a patient about their responsibilities.
But
we don’t own the benefits structure. There are a lot of moving parts in there.
To independently try to control that conversation across health systems, we
couldn’t possibly get it right.
So
one of the strategies we are pursuing is how do we work with each and every one
of our health systems to try and drive innovation around data sharing and
collaboration so that we can get the right answer for a shared patient.
That
“consumer” is shared between us as providers as well as the payer plan that
hosts the patient. Then you need to add another layer of extra complexity
around the employer population. Those three players need to be working
carefully together to be able to solve this problem. It’s not going to be a
single conversation.
Gardner: This need to share collaborative data
across multiple organizations is a big problem. Julie, how do you see this drive
for a customer-centric shared data equation playing out?
Healthy interoperability
Gerdeman: Technology and innovation are going to
drive the future of this. It's an opportunity for companies to come together.
That means interoperability, whether you're a payments provider like HealthPay24, or you're
providing statement information, you're providing estimates information. Across
those fronts, all of that data relates to one patient. Technology and innovation
can help solve these problems.
We
view interoperability as the key, and we hear it all the time. Northwell and our
other provider customers are asking for that transparency and interoperability.
We, as part of that community, need to be interoperable and integrate in order to
present data in a simple way that a consumer can understand.
When
you’re a consumer you want the information that you need at that moment to make
a decision. If you can get it proactively -- all the better. Underlying all
this, though, is trust. It’s something I like to talk about. Transparency is
needed because there is lack of trust.
Transparency is just part of
the trust equation. If you present transparency and you do it consistently, then
the consumer -- the patient -- has trust. They have immediate trust when they walk
into a provider or doctor’s office as a patient. Technology has an opportunity
to help solve that.
Gardner: Laura, you’re often at the intercept
point with patients. They are going to be asking you – the healthcare provider
-- their questions. They will look to you to be the funnel into this large
ecosystem behind the scenes.
What would you like to see
more of from those other players in that ecosystem to make your job easier, so
that you can provide that right level of trusted care upfront to the patient?
Simplify change and choice
Semlies: Collaboration and interoperability in
this space are essential. We need to see more of that.
The
other thing that we need -- and it's not necessarily from those players, but
from the collective whole -- is a sense of modeling “if-then” situations. If this
happens what will then happen?
By
leveraging from such process components, we can remodel things really well and
in a very sophisticated fashion. And that can work in many areas with so many
choices and paths that you could take. So far, we don't do any of that in price
transparency with our patients. And we need to because the boundaries are not
tight.
What
you charge – from copay to coinsurance – can change as you're moving from
observation to inpatient, or inpatient back to observation. It changes the
whole balance card for a patient. We need the capability to model that out and
articulate the why, how, and when -- and then explain what the impact is. It's
a very complicated conversation.
But
we need to figure out all of those options along with the drivers of costs. It
has to be made simple so that patients can engage, understand, and anticipate it.
Then, ultimately, we can explain to them their responsibility.
I often hear that patients are slow to
pay, or struggle to pay. Part of what makes them slow to pay is the confusion
and complexity around all of this information. I think patients want to pay
their share.
Earn patients’ trust
It’s just the complexity around this
makes it difficult, and it creates a friction point that shouldn't be there. We
do have a trust situation from an administrative perspective. I don't think our
patients trust us in regard to the cost of their care, and to what their share
of the care is.
I
don’t think they trust their insurers and payers tremendously. So we have to
earn trust. And it’s going to mean that we need to be way more accurate and upfront.
It’s about the basics. Did you give me a bill that I can understand? Did I have
options when I went to pay it? We don’t even do that easy stuff well today.
I used to joke that we should be paying patients to pay us because we make it so difficut. We are now in a better place. We are putting in the foundation so that we can earn trust and credibility.
I
used to joke that we should be paying patients to pay us because we made it so difficult.
We are now in a better place. We are putting in the foundation so that we can
earn trust and credibility. We are beginning the dialogue of, “What do you need
as a patient?” With that information, we can go back and create the tools to
engage with these patients.
We
have done more than 1,000 hours of patient focus group studies on financial
health issues, along with user testing to understand what they need to feel
better about their financial health. There is clinical health, there are clinical
outcomes -- but there is also financial health. Those are new words to
the industry.
If
I had a crystal ball, I’d say we’re going to be having new conversations around
what a patient needs to feel secure, that they understood what they were getting
into, and that they knew about their ability to pay it or had other options,
too.
Meet needs, offer options
Gerdeman:
Laura made two points
that I think are really important. The first is around learning, testing, and
modeling -- so we can look at the space differently. That means using predictive
analytics upfront in specific use cases to anticipate patient needs. What do
they need, and what works?
We
can use isolated, specific use-cases to test using technology -- and learn. For
example, we have offered up-front discounts for patients. If they pay in full,
they get a discount. We learned that there are certain cases where you can
collect more by offering a discount. That’s just one use-case, but predictive
analytics, testing, and learning are the key.
The
second thing that is dead-on is around options. Patients want options. Patients
want to know, “Okay, what are my choices?” If that’s an emergency situation, we
don’t have the option to research it, but then soon after, what are the choices?
Most
American consumers have less than $500 set aside for medical expenses. Do they
have the option of a self-service and flexible payment plan? Can they get a
loan? What are their choices to make an informed choice? Perhaps at home at their
convenience.
Those
are two examples where technology can really help play a role in the future.
Gardner: You really can’t separate the economics
from healthcare. We’re in a new era where economics and healthcare blend
together, the decision-making for both of them comes together.
We
talked about the need for data and how it can help collaboration and process
efficiency. It also allows for looking at that data and applying analytics,
learning from it, then applying those lessons back. So, it’s a really exciting
time.
But
I want to pause for a moment. Laura, your title of “Vice President of Digital
Patient Experience” is unique. What does it take to become a Vice President of
Digital Patient Experience?
Journey to self-service
Semlies:
That is a great
question. The Digital Patient Experience Office at Northwell is a new
organization inside of the health system. It’s not an initiative- or a program-focused
office where it’s one and done, where you go in and you deliver something and
then you’re done.
We
are rallying around the notion that the patient expects to be able to interact
with us digitally. To do so we need to transform our entire organization -- culturally,
operationally, and technically to be able accommodate that transformation.
Before,
I was responsible for revenue cycle transformation of the Northwell Health system.
So I do have a financial background. However, what set me up for pursuing this
digital transformation was the recognition that self-service was going to disrupt
the traditional revenue cycle. We need to have a new capability around self-service
that inherently allows the consumer to do what they want and need to manage
their administrative interactions differently with the health system.
I
was a constant voice for the last decade in our health system, saying, “We need
to do this to our infrastructure so that we can be able to rationalize and
standardize our core applications that serve the patient, including the revenue
cycle systems, so that we can interoperate in a different way and create a
platform by which patients can self-serve.”
And
we’re still in that journey, but we’re at a point where we can begin to engage very
differently. I’m working to solve three fundamental questions at the heart of
the primary pain-points, or friction points, that patients have.
Patients
tell us these three things: “You never remember who I am. I have been coming here
for the last 10 years and you still ask me for my name, my date of birth, my
insurance, my clinical history. You should know that by now.”
Two,
they say, “I can't figure out how to get in to see the right doctor at the
right time at the right location for me. Maybe it’s a great location for you,
or a great appointment time for you. But what if it doesn't work for me? How do
I fix that?”
And,
third, they say, “My bills are confusing. The whole process of trying to pay a
bill or get a question answered about one is infuriating.”
Whenever
you talk to anyone in our health system -- whether it’s our chief patient experience
officer, CEO, chief administrative officer, or COO -- those are the three things
that were also coming out of customer service, Press Ganey [patient
satisfaction] results, and complaints. When you have direct conversations with
patients, such as through family advisory councils, the complaints weren’t
about the clinical stuff.
Digital tools to ease the pain
It was all on the administrative burden
that we were putting on patients, and this anonymity that patients were walking
through our halls with. Those are what we needed to focus on first. And so that’s
what we’re doing.
We
will be bringing out a set of tools so our patients will be able to, in a very
systematic way, negotiate appointment management. They will be able to view and
manage their appointments online with the ability to book, change, and cancel
anything that they need to. They will simply see those appointments and get directions
to those appointments and communicate with those administrative officers.
The
second piece of the improvement is around the, “You never remember who I am” problem,
where they have been to a doctor and get the blank clipboard to fill out. Then,
regardless of whether they were there yesterday or went to see a new doctor, they
get the same blank clipboard.
We’re
focused on getting away from the clipboard to remembering information and not seeking
the same information twice -- only if there is the potential that information
has changed. Instead of a blank form, we present them the opportunity to revise.
And they do it remotely on their time. So we are respecting them by being truly
prepared when they come to the office.
The second piece of the improvement is around the, "You never remember who I am" problem, where they have been to a doctor and get the blank clipboard to fill out. Regardless of whether they were there yesterday or go to a new doctor, they get the same blank clipboard to fill out.
The
other side of “never remembering who I am” is proper authentication of digital
identity. It’s not just attaching a name with the face virtually. You have to be
able to authenticate so that information can be shared with the patient at home.
It means being able to have digital interactions that are not superficial.
The
third piece [of our patient experience improvement drive] is the online payment
portal for which we use HealthPay24. The vision is not only for patients to
be able to pay one bill, but for any party that has a responsibility within the
healthcare system -- whether it’s a lab, ambulance, hospital or physician – to
provide the capability to all be paid in a single transaction using our digital
tools. We take it one step further by giving it a retail experience, with such
features as “save the card on file” so if you paid the bill last week you
shouldn’t have to rekey those digits into the system.
We
plan to take it even further. For example, providing more options to pay -- whether
by a loan, payment plan, or to use such services as Apple Pay and Google Pay. We believe these
should be stable stakes, but we’re behind and are putting in those pieces now just
to catch up.
Our
longer-term vision goes far deeper. We expect to go all the way back to the
point of when patients are just beginning to seek care. How do I help them
understand what their financial responsibility and options are at that point,
before they even have a bill in our system? This is the early version of digital
transformation.
Champion patient loyalty
Gerdeman:
Everything Laura just
talked about comes down to one word -- loyalty. What they are putting in place
will drive patient loyalty, just like consumer loyalty. In the retail space we
have seen loyalty to certain brands because of how consumers interact with them,
as an emotional experience. It comes down to a combination of human elements and
technology to create the raving fans, in this case, of Northwell Health.
Gardner: We have seen the digital user
experience approach be very powerful in other industries. For example, when I
go to my bank digitally I can see all my transactions. I know what my balances
are. I can set payment schedules. If I go to my investment organization, I can
see the same thing with my retirement funds. If I go to my mortgage holder,
same thing. I can see what I owe on my house, and maybe I want a second
property and so I can immediately initiate a new loan. It’s all there. We know that
this can be done.
Julie,
what needs to happen to get that same level of digital transparency and give
the power to the consumer to make good choices across the healthcare sector?
Rx: Tech for improved healthcare
Gerdeman:
It requires a forward-looking
view into what’s possible. And we’re seeing disruption. At the recent HiMSS 2019 conference [in February
in Orlando] a gathering of 45,000 people were thinking like champions of
healthcare -- about what can be done and what’s possible. To me, that’s where
you start.
Like
Laura said, many are playing catch-up. But we also need to be leapfrogging into
the future. What emerging technologies can change the dynamic? Artificial
intelligence (AI) and what’s happening there, for example. How can we better
leverage predictive analytics? We’re also examining Blockchain, so what can distributed ledger
do and what role can it play?
I’m
really excited about what’s possible with marrying emerging technology, while still
solving the nuts and bolts of interoperability and integration. There is hard
work in integration and interoperability to get systems talking to one another.
You can’t get away from that ugly part of the job, but then there is an
exciting future part of job that I think is fundamental.
Laura also talked about culture and cultural shift. None of it can happen without an embrace of change management. That’s also hard because there are always people and personalities. But if you can embrace change management along with the technology disruption, new things can happen.
Semlies:
Julie mentioned the hard,
dirty work behind the scenes. That data work is really fundamental, and that has
prevented healthcare from becoming more digital. People are represented by
their data in the digital space. You only know people when you understand their
data.
In
healthcare -- at least from a provider perspective -- we have been pretty good
about collecting information about a patient’s clinical record. We understand
them clinically.
We
also do a pretty decent job at understanding the patient from a reimbursement
and charges perspective. We can get a bill out the door and get the bill paid. Sometimes
if we don’t get the bill paid, when it gets down to the secondary
responsibility, we do collect that information and we get those bills out. The interaction
is there.
What
we don’t do well is managing processes across hundreds of systems. There are hundreds
of systems in any big healthcare system today. The bridges and connections
between those data systems are just not there. So a patient often finds
themselves interacting with each and every one of them.
For
example, I am a patient as the mom of three kids. I am a patient as the daughter
of two aging parents. I am wife to a husband who I am interacting with. And I
am myself my own patient. The data that I need to deal with -- and the systems I
need to interact with -- when I am booking an appointment, versus paying a
bill, versus looking for lab results, versus trying to look for a growth chart
on a child -- I am left to self-navigate across this world. It’s very complex and
I don’t understand it as a patient.
Our
job is to figure out how to manage tomorrow and the patient of tomorrow who
wants to interact digitally. We have to be able to integrate all of these
different data points and make that universally accessible.
Electronic
medical record (EMR) portals deal more with the clinical interactions. Some
have gotten good at doing some of the administrative components, but certainly
not all of them. We need to create something that is far broader and has the capability
to connect the data points that live in silos today -- both operationally as
well as technically. This has to be the mandate.
Open the digital front door
Gardner: You don’t necessarily build trust when
you are asking the patient to be the middleware, to be the sneaker-ware, walking
between the PC and the mainframe.
Let’s
talk about some examples. In order to get cultural change, one of the tried-and-true
methods is to show initial progress, have a success story that you can champion.
That then leads to wider adoption, and so forth. What is Northwell
Health’s Digital Front Door Team? That seems an example of something that
works and could be a harbinger of a larger cultural shift.
Semlies:
Our Digital Front Door
Team is responsible for creating tools and technology to provide a single
access point for our patients. They won’t have to have multiple passwords or
multiple journeys in order to interact with us.
Over
the course of the last year, we've established a digital platform that all of our
digital technologies and personnel connect to. That last point is really
important because when a patient interacts with you digitally, there is a core expectation
today that if they have told you something digitally, as soon as they show up in
person, you are going to know it, use it, and remember it. The technology needs
to extend the conversation or journey of experience as opposed to starting over.
That was really critical for our platform to provide.
When a patient interacts with you digitally, there is a core expectation today that if they have told you something digitally, as soon as they show up, you are going to know it and use it. The technology needs to extend the conversation.
Such
a platform should consist of a single sign-on (SSO) capability,
an API management tool, and a customer
relationship management (CRM) database, from which we can learn all of the
information about a patient. The CRM data drives different kinds of experiences
that can be personalized and curated, and that data lives in the middle of the
two data topics we discussed earlier. We collect that data today, and the CRM tool
brokers all of this so it can be in the hands of every employee in the health
system.
The
last piece was to put meaningful tools around the friction points we talked
about, such as for appointment management. We can see availability of a
provider and book directly into it with no middleman. This is direct booking,
just like when I book an appointment on OpenTable.
No one has to call me back. They may just send a digital reminder.
Gardner:
And how has the Digital
Front Door Team worked out? Do you have any metrics of success?
Good for patients, good for providers
Semlies:
We took an agile
approach to implementing it. Our first component was putting in the online
payment capability with HealthPay24 in July 2018. Since then, we have
approximately $25 million collected. In just the last six months, there have
been more than 46,000 transactions. In December, we began a sign-in benefit so
patients can login and see all of their balances across Northwell.
We
had 3,000 people sign-in to that process in the first several weeks, and we’re
seeing evidence that our collections are starting to go up.
We
implemented our digital forms tool in September 2018. We collected more than 14,000
digital forms in the first few months. Patients are loving that capability. The
next version will be an at-home version so you will get text messages saying,
“We see you have booked an appointment. Here are your forms to prepare for your
visit.” They can get them all online.
We
are also piloting biometrics so that when you first show up at your appointment
you will have the opportunity to have your picture taken. It’s iris-scanning
and deep facial recognition technology so that will be the method of
authentication. That will also be used more over time for self check-ins and eventually
to access the ultimate portal.
The
intent was to deploy as early as there was value to the patient. Then over time
all of those services will be connected as a single experience. Next to come are
improved appointment management with the capability to book appointments online,
as well as to change, manage, see all appointments via a connection to the patient
portal.
All
of those connection points will be rendered through the same single sign-in by
the end of this quarter, both on our website, https://www.northwell.edu/, and via a proprietary
mobile app that will come out in the app stores.
Gardner:
Those metrics and rapid
adoption show that a good patient experience isn’t just good for the patient --
it’s good for the provider and across the entire process. Julie, is Northwell Health
unique in providing the digital front door approach?
Gerdeman: We are seeing more healthcare providers
adopt this approach, with one point of access into their systems, whether you
are finding a doctor or paying a bill. We have seen in our studies that seven
out 10 patients only go to a provider’s website to pay a bill.
From
a financial perspective, we are working hard with leaders like Laura whose new
roles support the digital patient experience. Creating that experience drives
adoption, and that adoption drives improved collections.
Ease-of-use entertains and retains clients
Semlies:
This channel is extremely
important to us from a patient loyalty and retention perspective. It’s our
opportunity to say, “We have heard you. We have an obligation to provide you
tools that are convenient, easy to use, and, quite frankly, delight you.”
But
the portal is not the only channel. We recognize that we have to be in lots of
different places from the adoption perspective. The portal is not the only place
every patient is going. There will be opportunities for us to populate what I
refer to as the book-now button. And the book-now button cannot be exclusive to
the Northwell digital front door.
I need to have that book-now button in the hands of every payer agent who is on
the phone talking to a patient or in their digital channel or membership. I
need to have it out in the Zocdocs of the
world, and in any other open scheduling application out there.
I
need to have ratings and reviews. We need to be multichannel in our funnel in,
but once we get you in we have to give you tools and resources that surprise
and delight you and make that re-engagement with somebody else harder because we
make it so easy for you to use our health system.
And
we have to be portable so you can take it with you if you need to go somewhere.
The concept is that we have to be full service, and we want to give you all of the
tools so you can be happy about the service you are getting -- not just the
clinical outcome but the administrative service, too.
Gardner:
It certainly sounds
like Northwell is significantly differentiating itself with this customer-centric
focus. It’s likely that as experiences improve, patients will vote with their
spend across their healthcare provider choices. This will then further
instigate more change in the culture and the overall adoption of improved best
practices for patient well-being and satisfaction.
I’m
afraid we’ll have to leave it there. You have been listening to a sponsored
BriefingsDirect healthcare insights discussion exploring the shift medical
services providers are making to improve the overall patient experience in the
healthcare sector.
And we have learned how improving patient experiences will increasingly rely on the many tools available to other types of businesses.
So
please join me now in thanking our guests, Laura Semlies, Vice President of Digital
Patient Experience at Northwell Health in metro New York, and Julie Gerdeman,
President at HealthPay24 in Mechanicsburg,
Penn.
And
a big thanks to our audience for joining this HealthPay24-sponsored thought
leadership discussion. I’m Dana Gardner, Principal Analyst at Interarbor
Solutions, your host and moderator. Thanks again for listening, and do come
back next time.
Listen to the podcast. Find it on iTunes. Download the transcript. Sponsor: HealthPay24.
Transcript of a discussion on how healthcare
providers are employing processes and technologies from such industries as
retail and financial services to vastly improve the experience and quality of
care from the medical patients’ perspective. Copyright Interarbor Solutions,
LLC, 2005-2019. All rights reserved.
You may also be interested in:
- Data-driven and intelligent healthcare processes improve patient outcomes while making the IT increasingly invisible
- Price transparency in healthcare to regain patient trust requires accuracy via better use of technology
- Regional dental firm Great Expressions protects distributed data with lower complexity thanks to amalgam of Nutanix HCI and Bitdefender security
- How a large Missouri medical center developed an agile healthcare infrastructure security strategy
- How The Open Group Healthcare Forum and Health Enterprise Reference Architecture cures process and IT ills
- Philips teams with HPE on ecosystem approach to improve healthcare informatics-driven outcomes
- A tale of two hospitals—How healthcare economics in Belgium hastens need for new IT buying schemes
- Balancing costs with conscience—How new tools help any business build ethical and sustainable supply chains
